Nicole
Gilmer
In Marlon James’ “The Book of Night
Women,” there is a scene in which the narrator is describing Christmas on Montpelier
Estate. She describes the preacher that comes and tells the slaves “that the
Bible say them to stand firm in they suffering ‘cause that is they lot for
being the cursed son of Noah” (149). I found this interesting because of the
reference to Canaan. In Genesis, there is a story about Noah becoming drunk and
his son, Ham, seeing him passed out and naked. When Noah wakes up, he curses
Canaan and says that he will be as a slave to his brothers and will be the
lowest of the low. Canaan was Ham’s son, and did not actually see Noah in his
drunken/naked state. So it is interesting that Noah would choose to curse
Canaan instead of Ham. But that’s part of why I find it so significant in the
novel. The child is paying for the “crime” which their parent committed.
Lilith specifically is a victim of
circumstance. Because her mother was a slave, she too is “cursed” and relegated
to slavery; even though her father was white. Further, there is a school of
thought which states that, in the bible, Noah cursed Canaan instead of Ham
because it is harder for the father to watch his son suffer than for the father
to suffer directly. This also mimics Lilith’s experience at Montpelier. Her
father committed the crime of having a child with a slave and because of his
actions, his child suffered far more directly than he himself. This may be why
the slaves are told to “stand firm” in their suffering. Perhaps the suffering
of the slaves is God’s punishment for their fore bearers and not for them.
No comments:
Post a Comment